FINMA authorisation
Your single FINMA licence project, run in one place: choosing the right licence, building the application, and carrying the supervisory dialogue through to approval.
Explore FINMA authorisationMost financial businesses need permission from the regulator before they can trade in Switzerland. We work out which permission you need (a FINMA licence, SRO membership, or sometimes none) and carry the file through to approval, then run the compliance function afterwards.
Six service areas, one file owner. Start with the one closest to your business.
The core licences any Swiss financial business may need, plus the digital-asset work that is growing fastest: crypto and DLT authorisation, stablecoin and token rulings, and the new FINMA categories arriving in 2027.
Your single FINMA licence project, run in one place: choosing the right licence, building the application, and carrying the supervisory dialogue through to approval.
Explore FINMA authorisationAuthorisation for managers of individual client portfolios, supervised through a Supervisory Organisation. The most common Swiss financial licence since the FinIA transition closed.
Explore this serviceAuthorisation for professional trustees who set up or administer trusts in or from Switzerland, the same FinIA route as asset managers, with trust-specific requirements.
Explore this serviceFund-management and manager-of-collective-assets authorisation under the Collective Investment Schemes Act, plus the distribution and representative arrangements that go with it.
Explore this serviceSecurities-firm authorisation for dealing, market-making and client execution, including trading-venue questions under the Financial Market Infrastructure Act.
Explore this serviceFull banking authorisation, and the lighter FinTech deposit licence for businesses that hold up to CHF 100 million of public funds without lending them out.
Explore this serviceAuthorisation for payment, e-money and money-transmitting businesses today, and a path to the dedicated Payment Instrument Institution licence arriving in 2027.
Explore this serviceCustody, trading and staking under the incoming Crypto-Institution regime, and DLT trading-facility licences under the DLT Act. Switzerland licensed its first DLT venue in 2025.
See our crypto deskFINMA token classification and stablecoin rulings, plus readiness for the OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) that Switzerland is adopting from 2026.
Explore this serviceMembership of a Self-Regulatory Organisation (VQF, ARIF or SO-FIT) for financial intermediaries with anti-money-laundering duties under AMLA, often the fastest route to market.
Explore this serviceRegistration of client advisers in the FinSA adviser register, with the conduct, suitability and documentation rules that come with advising Swiss clients.
Explore this serviceA retained compliance function and external AML officer: policies, transaction monitoring, KYC, and preparation for the annual SRO and FINMA audit, handled month to month.
Explore this serviceThe first question is always the same: do you need a licence at all, and if so, which one? Swiss regulation has two separate gates, and they are easy to confuse. A FINMA licence is permission to run a regulated activity: managing client money, operating a fund, taking deposits. SRO membership is something different: an anti-money-laundering registration for firms that handle other people’s funds as a business, granted by a private body that FINMA itself supervises. Some businesses need a FINMA licence, some need only SRO membership, some need both, and, more often than founders expect, some need neither. Getting it wrong is costly either way: an unnecessary licence burns months and capital, while operating without a required one is a criminal offence.
| Your activity | Regime | Supervisor | Typical timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Managing third-party portfolios | FinIA authorisation | FINMA, via a Supervisory Organisation | 4–8 months |
| Acting as a professional trustee | FinIA authorisation | FINMA, via a Supervisory Organisation | 4–8 months |
| Fund management / collective assets | CISA licence | FINMA | 6–12 months |
| Crypto, payment or money transmitting | SRO membership | An SRO under AMLA | 2–4 months |
| Taking deposits from the public | Banking or FinTech licence | FINMA | 6–18 months |
| Trading only your own funds | No licence | — | n/a |
The table is a starting point, not an opinion. The boundaries turn on detail: whether assets are pooled, whether you have discretion, how clients are solicited, where the activity is directed. We resolve those edges in a written regulatory assessment before any application is filed, so you commit budget against a confirmed route rather than a guess.
Several common structures sit outside Swiss licensing entirely: single-family offices that trade only the family's own capital, pure holding and IP-owning companies, and advisers who never receive or hold client money. We have closed engagements by establishing that a client's planned activity needed no licence, saving the regulatory cost rather than manufacturing it. If that is your situation, we will tell you in the first call.
Carrying on a regulated activity without the required authorisation is not a paperwork lapse. Under the Financial Market Supervisory Act it is a criminal offence; FINMA can open enforcement proceedings, order the disgorgement of profits, appoint an investigating agent at your expense, and bar the responsible individuals from the industry. Swiss banks will also decline or close accounts once an unlicensed regulated activity surfaces in onboarding. The practical lesson is to confirm the regime before you launch, not after a counterparty or a bank raises it.
Authoritative sources: the regulator publishes its authorisation guidance at finma.ch, and the consolidated federal statutes (FINMASA, FinIA, AMLA, CISA) are at fedlex.admin.ch.
Non-confidential mandates from more than a decade of Swiss financial-regulation work, dating back to 2014: SRO affiliations, FINMA and FinIA licensing, and regulatory enquiries across crypto, payments, asset management and token projects.
SRO authorisation · FINMA non-subordination ruling
FinIA licence
SRO authorisation · FINMA non-subordination ruling
SRO authorisation · FINMA non-subordination ruling
SRO authorisation · FINMA non-subordination ruling
SRO affiliation
SRO affiliation
SRO affiliation
SRO affiliation
Listed with each client’s agreement (non-NDA). Engagement details are kept general; specifics are covered by professional confidentiality.




Recent licensing and financial-regulation engagements. Anonymised. Names are used only with written client consent.
A client running asset-management companies in the UAE and the Cayman Islands was referred to us by an international firm, intending to replicate his services in Switzerland.
OutcomeThe company was registered and the regulatory documentation submitted; a locally appointed managing director now oversees the ongoing licensing process.
An early-stage crypto investor approached us to establish a regulated financial-services company in Canton Zug for crypto-related activities.
OutcomeThe company obtained SRO membership and authorisation to operate. We continue as its external AML Officer and support its ongoing regulatory audits.
A foreign client came to us planning to establish an investment company in Switzerland.
OutcomeThe client launched a fully operational family office with no unnecessary licensing, with brokerage and banking in place from day one.
A company with several equal shareholders hit a classic conflict over uneven workload and contribution.
OutcomeThe shareholders reached a new agreement, the company was recapitalised, and it obtained SRO authorisation, resolving the internal conflict and the regulatory gap in one engagement.
A client came to us to obtain a licence for trading non-ferrous and precious metals (gold, silver, platinum) and related investment activity.
OutcomeThe client avoided unnecessary licensing cost and launched with a properly structured vehicle.
A major international employment agency wanted to open a Swiss office, an activity needing two-tier authorisation: cantonal first, then federal (SECO).
OutcomeThe company obtained both cantonal and federal authorisation. The later director change was approved without disruption.
Representative matters, anonymised. Specifics are illustrative and outcomes depend on the facts of each case. Client names are used only with written consent.
Send us a two-line description of the activity. A partner responds with the likely regime (FINMA, SRO or neither) before you commit to anything.