Wealth structuring
Bringing entities, holdings, residence and succession into one coherent structure around the move.
Wealth structuringExpenditure-based taxation lets a qualifying foreign national be taxed on living expenditure rather than worldwide income: a legitimate, long-established Swiss regime, not a loophole. But the attractive headline depends on three things solved together: the right canton, a tax ruling negotiated and accepted by the authority, and a residence permit that actually lets you move. We model the base, secure the ruling, and coordinate the permit, so the relocation is executable, not just appealing on paper.
Canton, ruling and permit, solved together.
Expenditure-based taxation, set out in the federal direct-tax law and described by the federal portal, taxes a qualifying foreign national on annual living expenditure rather than actual worldwide income and wealth. The base is floored by statute, agreed in advance with the canton, and taxed at ordinary rates. It is available only to foreign nationals taking Swiss residence without gainful activity here. The regime is durable (reaffirmed by a 2014 national vote), but the canton, the ruling and the permit must be solved as one.
Relocation usually connects to wealth structuring, succession planning and opening a Swiss bank account.
The tax base is the higher of real living expenditure and the statutory minimums, agreed with the canton and taxed at ordinary rates.
| Element | How it works |
|---|---|
| Federal minimum base | CHF 400,000 in statute, indexed (~CHF 430k, 2025) |
| Rent multiple | At least 7× annual rent or rental value |
| Cantonal minimum | Set by each canton, often higher |
| Control calculation | Not below ordinary tax on Swiss-source items |
Because cantons differ markedly on both minimums and rates, the canton is chosen on the modelled outcome and the lifestyle together, not on a headline figure. We run the numbers for the relevant cantons against a realistic residence before any commitment, so the agreed base is one the authority will accept and the client can live with.
Lump-sum taxation is a federal regime, but each canton decides whether to offer it for its own taxes, and five have abolished it by popular vote. Where you can take it, and where you cannot, narrows the choice before lifestyle does.
| Status | Cantons | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Abolished (cantonal) | Zurich, Schaffhausen, Basel-Stadt, Basel-Landschaft, Appenzell AR | Not available for cantonal tax |
| Offered, popular | Geneva, Vaud, Valais, Ticino, Graubünden | Established practice; cantonal minimums apply |
| Offered | Most remaining cantons | Central-Swiss cantons among the lower-rate options |
Note the asymmetry: even an abolishing canton’s residents still pay the federal lump sum. Abolition removes only the cantonal and communal layer, which is the larger part. For most clients the real choice is among the French-speaking and central cantons that actively welcome the regime. We shortlist on the agreed base, the rate and the residence permit together, because the canton that models best on tax is not always the one that grants the permit most readily.
Model the canton, negotiate the ruling, coordinate the permit, then settle the practicalities, in that order.
Checking nationality, residence history and the no-Swiss-activity condition before anything is planned around the regime.
Comparing the base, rate and treaty position across candidate cantons against a realistic residence.
Presenting the case to the chosen canton’s authority and securing an accepted, sustainable expenditure base.
Running the residence permit in parallel, so the tax arrangement and the right to move align.
Handling registration, banking and the wider structuring once the move is executable.
The advisory fee depends on the complexity of the affairs, the number of cantons modelled and whether the work extends into wider structuring and the permit. The annual tax itself is the agreed base at ordinary cantonal and federal rates, modelled up front so the client knows the figure before committing.
We scope and quote against the situation. Advisory pricing is on request.
Discuss your moveA lump-sum arrangement that holds rests on:
The regime does not suit everyone it first attracts. Someone who wants to work or actively run a business in Switzerland cannot use it. Someone whose income comes largely from a treaty country that limits benefits for lump-sum taxpayers may pay more, not less, once the treaty position is accounted for. And in a canton with a high minimum base, an individual of more modest means can find ordinary taxation cheaper. The honest analysis sometimes ends in “not this regime” or “not this canton”, which is why the modelling comes before the move, not after.
A relocation that works is the tax ruling, the permit and the practicalities solved as one. Running all three, for cross-border families, is the work this firm does.
The lump-sum base compared across cantons against a realistic residence, so the canton is chosen on a full picture, not a headline rate.
The expenditure base presented to and agreed with the cantonal authority — predictable, sustainable, and secured before commitment.
The residence permit coordinated alongside the ruling, so the move is one the family can actually make, not just an attractive plan.
Bringing entities, holdings, residence and succession into one coherent structure around the move.
Wealth structuringWills, choice of law and forced-heirship planning for a cross-border family settling in Switzerland.
Succession & estate planningThe introduction and source-of-wealth file that get the account opened once you arrive.
Swiss bank accountTell us your nationality, means and where you'd like to live. A partner models the lump-sum base across cantons and maps the route to a ruling and a residence permit.