Over-indebtedness (Art. 725 CO)
The interim accounts, measures and court notification the board must handle as the deficit nears.
Over-indebtedness (Art. 725 CO)When the business is sound but the balance sheet or the cash flow is not, the problem can often be fixed by reworking the financing (refinancing, rescheduling, capital measures, creditor negotiation) rather than winding the company down. The whole value depends on timing: act while there are still options and a viable company comes back to stability; wait until the cash has nearly run out and the board’s duties shift to formal steps. We help boards act in time, design the plan, and lead the negotiation, while keeping the directors’ duties in view.
Consensual, out of court, while there’s still room.
Financial restructuring returns a viable but distressed company to stability without formal insolvency: refinancing, rescheduling debt, capital measures, and creditor negotiation. The premise is a sound business with an unsound balance sheet or cash flow, fixable by reworking the financing. Done in time, it preserves the value that formal proceedings under the Code of Obligations and the debt-enforcement law would erode. The art is acting while there is still room.
Restructuring runs alongside the board’s over-indebtedness duties, may need a composition moratorium, or precede distressed M&A.
The right combination depends on whether the problem is liquidity, the balance sheet, or both — and on what creditors and shareholders will support.
| Lever | Addresses |
|---|---|
| Refinancing | Replacing or extending debt on workable terms |
| Rescheduling | Matching payments to real capacity |
| Capital increase | Injecting equity to repair the balance sheet |
| Debt-to-equity | Converting debt to cure over-indebtedness |
These are deployed together as one coordinated plan, not singly, and often with operational measures on the cost base alongside. We design the combination to the company’s actual problem and to the appetite of the creditors and shareholders who must agree to it, because a plan no one will support is no plan.
The levers only work once the problem is named correctly. A company can be profitable and still run out of cash, or cash-generative and still over-indebted, and the two call for opposite first moves.
| Liquidity crisis | Balance-sheet crisis | |
|---|---|---|
| The problem | Cash runs out before revenue lands | Liabilities exceed assets |
| First move | Bridge funding, rescheduling | Equity, debt-to-equity, subordination |
| The risk if ignored | Default on a payment due | Art. 725b filing duty |
Most distressed companies have both, in some mix, and treating only the visible one is how restructurings fail. A bridge loan that papers over a balance-sheet hole buys weeks and deepens the eventual loss. When the business is viable but needs protected time to execute, an out-of-court plan gives way to a composition moratorium. We diagnose which crisis is driving before committing to a lever.
Test viability, design the plan, negotiate the support, and execute, watching the board’s duties throughout.
Establishing honestly whether the underlying business is sound and worth restructuring.
Building the combination of refinancing, rescheduling and capital measures the problem needs.
Preparing the figures and the restructuring plan that creditors and shareholders can trust.
Leading the negotiation, coordinating creditors so they move together rather than one triggering collapse.
Watching the over-indebtedness threshold and the directors’ duties, so the board is protected.
Cost depends on the complexity of the debt, the number of creditors to coordinate and the depth of the measures. It is, however, set against what is at stake: a successful restructuring preserves a business and value that a disorderly collapse would destroy, which makes the advisory cost modest by comparison when the company is genuinely viable.
We scope and quote against the situation. Pricing is on request.
Discuss your situationA restructuring that actually rescues the company rests on:
The honest limit of financial restructuring is that it reworks the financing of a sound business. It cannot make an unviable one viable. A company whose problem is not its balance sheet but its underlying economics will not be rescued by rescheduling debt; restructuring it merely delays and deepens the loss, often to the detriment of creditors and the personal exposure of the board. The first question is therefore the hardest and most important: is the business genuinely viable? Where the answer is yes, restructuring can be powerful. Where it is no, the honest course is an orderly exit, and we say so rather than prolong the inevitable at everyone’s expense.
Testing viability honestly, designing the measures, leading the creditor negotiation and guarding the board is the work this firm does, while there is still room to act.
Helping the board move at the first reliable signs of strain, when refinancing and negotiation still work from strength.
Transparent figures and a coherent plan that coordinate creditors to support a viable company rather than force a collapse.
The over-indebtedness threshold and the directors’ duties watched throughout, so the restructuring protects the board too.
The interim accounts, measures and court notification the board must handle as the deficit nears.
Over-indebtedness (Art. 725 CO)The court-supervised shelter when a viable company needs protection to reorganise.
Composition moratoriumSelling the viable business or assets where restructuring the whole is not the answer.
Distressed M&ATell us the position honestly. A partner assesses viability, designs the restructuring, and leads the creditor negotiation, while watching the board's duties.